Formability investigation of two advanced high-strength steels: conventional versus high total elongation 780 MPa grades
Francislaynne Lages Dias, Fabrício Moreira Cerqueira, Flávio José Saraiva Rodrigues, Marden Valente de Souza, Jetson Ferreira Lemos, Roan Sampaio de Souza, Gabriel Godinho Alves, Felipe Pereira Finamor, Fabiano José Fabri Miranda
Abstract
Advanced High-Strength Steels are widely employed in the automotive industry to reduce vehicle mass without compromising structural integrity and safety requirements. However, the limited formability of these materials imposes significant constraints on forming processes. This study compares the formability of an AHSS with a minimum tensile strength of 780 MPa, industrially produced through two distinct thermomechanical processing routes: conventional and optimized with high total elongation. The samples were characterized in terms of microstructure, mechanical behavior and formability. The results indicate that the optimized condition, featuring greater homogeneity, higher volume fractions of bainite and retained austenite, and increased elongation, exhibited a 20% increase in FLC0 and 55% improvement in edge stretchability, demonstrating substantial enhancements in both global and local formability. Numerical simulation of the stamping process showed a significant reduction in failure due to fracture. These findings were validated at the industrial scale, where the rework rate of stamped parts was reduced from 30–40% to nearly zero. Such results reinforce the importance of microstructural control as a key tool to enable the application of AHSS materials in automotive components with complex geometries.
Keywords
Referências
1 Ren Y, Li S, Feng S, Li Y, Yuan C. In Situ EBSD Observation and Numerical Simulation of Microstructure Evolution and Strain Localization of DP780 Dual-Phase Steel. Materials (Basel). 2025;18(2):426. https://doi. org/10.3390/ma18020426.
2 Paul KP. A critical review on hole expansion ratio. Materialia. 2020;9:100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. mtla.2019.100566.
3 Paul KP. Controlling factors of forming limit curve: a review. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. 2021;2:100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aime.2021.100033.
4 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6892-1:2019 - Metallic materials — Tensile testing — Part 1: Method of test at room temperature. Geneva: ISO; 2017.
5 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 16630:2017 - Metallic materials — Sheet and strip — Hole expanding test. Geneva: ISO; 2017.
6 Cayssials F, Lemoine X. Predictive model of FLD (Arcelor model) upgraded to UHSS Steels. In: Proceedings of the International Deep Drawing Research Group; 2005 June 20-22; Besançon, France. Besançon: IDDRG; 2005.
7 Aranzabal J, Gutierrez I, Rodriguez-Ibabe JM, Urcola JJ. Influence of the amount and morphology of retained austenite on the mechanical properties of an austempered ductile iron. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. A, Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science. 1997;28(6):1143-1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-997-0280-6.
8 Fonstein N. Dual-phase steels. In: Rana R, Singh SB, editors. Automotive steels – design, metallurgy, processing and applications. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2017. p. 169–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100638- 2.00007-9.
9 Zhao J, He K, Guo Y, Fan X, Yan B, Lu X, et al. Evolution of microstructure and mechanical properties in dualphase steel containing Ce and Nb. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2024;33(18):9829-9839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08627-5.
10 Zhou L, Xue R, Cao X, Wen C. Study on the differences in microstructure, mechanical properties, and deformation mechanism between DH and DP steels. Iron Steel Vanadium Titanium. 2023, 44(6): 186-191. https://doi. org/10.7513/j.issn.1004-7638.2023.06.026
Submetido em:
30/09/2025
Aceito em:
28/12/2025
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email