Chalcopyrite hydrophobicity evaluated by contact angle: influence of pH and mixed thiophosphate collectors
Artur Junqueira Weigel; Gustavo Victor Batista e Silva; Daniela Gomes Horta; Rafaela Fernanda Carvalhal Passos
Abstract
Chalcopyrite hydrophobicity plays a central role in copper flotation and is governed by surface chemistry and interfacial phenomena. In this study, contact angle measurements were used to evaluate the natural hydrophobicity of chalcopyrite and compare it with that of spodumene, apatite, and calcite under controlled pH conditions. The effect of a dithiophosphate (DTP) collector and a mixed dithiophosphate–monothiophosphate (DTP/MTP) system on chalcopyrite wettability was also investigated. Chalcopyrite exhibited the highest natural contact angle among the minerals studied, while apatite and calcite were strongly hydrophilic. Increasing pH enhanced the contact angle of all minerals. Both DTP and DTP/MTP increased chalcopyrite hydrophobicity, but the mixed collector achieved similar contact angles at significantly lower concentrations. These results indicate a cooperative adsorption mechanism consistent with the literature, in which chemisorption of DTP and physisorption of MTP generate a denser and more efficient hydrophobic surface film. Contact angle analysis is demonstrated to be a rapid and cost-effective tool for predicting flotation behavior.
Keywords
Referências
1 Aleksandrova TN, Orlova AV, Taranov VA. Current status of copper-ore processing: a review. Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals. 2021;62(4):375-381. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821221040027.
2 USGS. Mineral commodity summaries 2024: copper. Reston (VA): U.S. Geological Survey; 2024 [cited 2026 Feb 26]. Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024-copper.pdf
3 Nacional de Mineração A. Sumário mineral brasileiro 2020: cobre (ano-base 2019). Brasília: ANM; 2020 [cited 2026 Feb 26]. Available at: https://www.gov.br/anm/pt-br/assuntos/economia-mineral/publicacoes/sumariomineral/sumario-mineral-brasileiro-2020-/cobre-2020-ano-base-2019.pdf
4 Feng Q, Yang W, Wen S, Wang H, Zhao W, Han G. Flotation of copper oxide minerals: a review. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2022;32(6):1351-1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.09.011.
5 Baba AA, Ayinla KI, Adekola FA, Ghosh MK, Ayanda OS, Bale RB, et al. A review on novel techniques for chalcopyrite ore processing. Int J Min Eng Miner Process. 2012;1(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.mining.20120101.01.
6 Barros KS, Vielmo VS, Moreno BG, Riveros G, Cifuentes G, Bernardes AM. Chemical composition data of the main stages of copper production from sulfide minerals in Chile: a review to assist circular economy studies. Minerals (Basel). 2022;12(2):250. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12020250.
7 Chandra AP, Gerson AR. A review of the fundamental studies of the copper activation mechanisms for selective flotation of the sulfide minerals, sphalerite and pyrite. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2009;145(1-2): 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2008.09.001.
8 An D, Zhang J. A study of temperature effect on the xanthate’s performance during chalcopyrite flotation. Minerals (Basel). 2020;10(5):426. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10050426.
9 Bruckard WJ, Sparrow GJ, Woodcock JT. A review of the effects of the grinding environment on the flotation of copper sulphides. International Journal of Mineral Processing. 2011;100(1-2):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2011.04.001.
10 Park I, Hong S, Jeon S, Ito M, Hiroyoshi N. A review of recent advances in depression techniques for flotation separation of Cu-Mo sulfides in porphyry copper deposits. Metals. 2020;10(9):1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10091269.
11 Chau TT. A review of techniques for measurement of contact angles and their applicability on mineral surfaces. Minerals Engineering. 2009;22(3):213-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2008.07.009.
12 Arvay A, Yli-Rantala E, Liu CH, Peng XH, Koski P, Cindrella L, et al. Characterization techniques for gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: a review. Journal of Power Sources. 2012;213:317-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.026.
13 Akbari R, Antonini C. Contact angle measurements: from existing methods to an open-source tool. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2021;294:102479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102470.
14 Zhang M, Chu L, Chen J, Qi F, Li X, Chen X, et al. Asymmetric wettability fibrous membranes: preparation and biologic applications. Composites. Part B, Engineering. 2024;269:110845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111095.
15 Pawliszak P, Bradshaw-Hajek BH, Skinner W, Beattie DA, Krasowska M. Frothers in flotation: a review of performance and function in the context of chemical classification. Minerals Engineering. 2024;207:108136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108567.
16 Handschuh-Wang S, Wang B, Wang T, Stadler FJ. Measurement principles for room temperature liquid and fusible metals’ surface tension. Surfaces and Interfaces. 2023;39:102784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2023.102921.
17 Di Maio E, Iannace S, Mensitieri G, Pastore Carbone MG, Scherillo G. Interfacial tension. In: Di Maio E, Iannace S, Mensitieri G, editors. Supercritical fluid science and technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2021. p. 231-261.
18 Ojeda Escamilla C, Romo Rojas E, Medina Castilleja JF, Reyes Bahena JL. Caracterización mineralógica aplicada al proceso de beneficio de minerales. In: AIMMGM XXVI Convención Internacional de Minería; 2005 Oct 12-15; Veracruz, México. México. Asociación de Ingenieros de Minas, Metalurgistas y Geólogos de México (AIMMGM); 2005. p. 295-300.
19 Majumder SK, Singh A. Flotation technique: its mechanisms and design parameters. Chemical Engineering and Processing. 2018;127:249-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.03.029.
20 Abreu SB, Brien C, Skinner W. ToF-SIMS as a new method to determine the contact angle of mineral surfaces. Langmuir : The ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids. 2010;26(11):8122-8130. https://doi.org/10.1021/la904443s.
21 Güler T, Hiçyilmaz C. Hydrophobicity of chalcopyrite with dithiophosphate and dithiophosphinate in electrochemically controlled condition. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2004;235(1-3):11-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.01.009.
22 Muganda S, Zanin M, Grano SR. Benchmarking flotation performance: single minerals. International Journal of Mineral Processing. 2011;98(3-4):182-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2010.12.001.
23 Muganda S, Zanin M, Grano SR. Influence of particle size and contact angle on the flotation of chalcopyrite in a laboratory batch flotation cell. International Journal of Mineral Processing. 2011;98(3-4):150-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2010.11.004.
24 Petrus HTBM, Hirajima T, Sasaki K, Okamoto H. Effects of sodium thiosulphate on chalcopyrite and tennantite: an insight for alternative separation technique. International Journal of Mineral Processing. 2012;102-103:116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2011.11.002.
25 Hirajima T, Miki H, Suyantara GPW, Matsuoka H, Elmahdy AM, Sasaki K, et al. Selective flotation of chalcopyrite and molybdenite with H2 O2 oxidation. Minerals Engineering. 2017;100:83-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2016.10.007.
26 Bradshaw DJ, Harris PJ, O’Connor CT. Synergistic interactions between reagents in sulphide flotation. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 1998;98(4):189-194.
27 Liu G, Xiao J, Zhou D, Zhong H, Choi P, Xu Z. A DFT study on the structure-reactivity relationship of thiophosphorus acids as flotation collectors with sulfide minerals: implication of surface adsorption. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2013;434:243-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.05.050.
28 Buckley AN, Hope GA, Parker GK, Steyn J, Woods R. Mechanism of mixed dithiophosphate and mercaptobenzothiazole collectors for Cu sulfide ore minerals. Minerals Engineering. 2017;109:80-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2017.03.002.
29 Song Z, Wen S, Zhang Q, Shen Z, Han G, Feng Q. Flotation behavior and co-adsorption essence of combined SBX/MBT collectors to sulfidized azurite. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2025;13(5):117860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.117860.
30 Wang X, Wen S, Chen S, He L, Han G, Feng Q. Synergistic adsorption mechanism of sodium dibutyldithiocarbamate and ammonium dibutyldithiophosphate on chalcopyrite surface and its response to flotation separation of Cu-Fe sulfide minerals. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2025;726:138093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.138093.
31 Lu Y, Drelich J, Miller JD. Oleate adsorption at an apatite surface studied by ex-situ FTIR internal reflection spectroscopy. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1998;202(2):462-476. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1998.5466.
32 Tredwin CJ, Young AM, Georgiou G, Shin SH, Kim HW, Knowles JC. Hydroxyapatite, fluor-hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite produced via the sol-gel method. Optimisation, characterisation and rheology. Dental Materials : Official Publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2013;29(2):166-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.008
33 Xu L, Hu Y, Wu H, Tian J, Liu J, Gao Z, et al. Surface crystal chemistry of spodumene with different size fractions and implications for flotation. Separation and Purification Technology. 2016;169:33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. seppur.2016.06.005.
34 Xu L, Liu J, Meng J, Cao Y, Wang D, Fan G, et al. Understanding the anisotropic wettability of spodumene from direct force measurement using AFM and density functional theory calculations. Minerals Engineering. 2024;205:108454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108454.
35 Zhu G, Wang X, Li E, Wang Y, Miller JD. Wetting characteristics of spodumene surfaces as influenced by collector adsorption. Minerals Engineering. 2019;130:117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.10.010.
36 Guan Y, Zhao H, Guo Y, Feng Q, Zhang W, Wang H, et al. Mn-SS as a novel depressant of the flotation process of scheelite and calcite: role and mechanism. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2024;686:133443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.133443.
37 Filippov L, Farrokhpay S, Lyo L, Filippova I. Spodumene flotation mechanism. Minerals (Basel). 2019;9(7):372. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9060372.
38 Sharma PK, Rao KH. Adhesion of Paenibacillus polymyxa on chalcopyrite and pyrite: surface thermodynamics and extended DLVO theory. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces. 2003;29(1):21-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7765(02)00180-7.
39 Adkins SJ, Pearse MJ. The influences of collector chemistry on kinetics and selectivity in base-metal sulphide flotation. Minerals Engineering. 1992;5(3-5):295-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-6875(92)90212-R.
40 Lotter NO, Bradshaw DJ. The formulation and use of mixed collectors in sulphide flotation. Minerals Engineering. 2010;23(11-13):945-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2010.03.011.
41 Tijsseling LT, Dehaine Q, Rollinson GK, Glass HJ. Flotation of mixed oxide sulphide copper-cobalt minerals using xanthate, dithiophosphate, thiocarbamate and blended collectors. Minerals Engineering. 2019;138:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.04.022.
42 Adamson AW, Gast AP. Physical chemistry of surfaces. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 1997.
43 Rosen MJ, Kunjappu JT. Surfactants and interfacial phenomena. 4th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118228920.
44 Wang XH, Forssberg EKS. Mechanism of pyrite flotation with xanthates. International Journal of Mineral Processing. 1991;33(1-4):275-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(91)90058-Q.
45 Nagaraj DR, Ravishankar SA. Flotation reagents – a critical overview from an industry perspective. In: Fuerstenau MC, Jameson GJ, Yoon RH, editors. Froth flotation: a century of innovation. Littleton: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration; 2007. p. 375-423.
Submetido em:
26/02/2026
Aceito em:
12/08/2026
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email